- Does Diversity Dilute the Warrior Ethos?
- Navigation menu
- Spartan Singapore Obstacle Course Races | HURRICANE HEAT: WHY THE WARRIOR ETHOS?
- You are here:
Show him to me, and I will yield to your weariness and go home. Instead, a great cheer arose from the army. The men begged their king to forgive them for their want of spirit and pleaded with him only to lead them forward. No, not the terrible movie, but the book, which is one of the greatest leadership books you can read. What is the moral difference, if any, between the soldier and the civilian? A soldier accepts personal responsibility for the safety of the body politic of which he is a member, defending it, if need be, with his life.
The civilian does not. Army armor officer who has served in leadership and staff roles in deployments to Iraq, Afghanistan, and Korea as part of the "Regionally Aligned Forces" mission. He will report soon to Columbia University to earn a graduate degree in Leadership and Organizational Psychology followed by an assignment at West Point. The opinions expressed are his alone, and do not reflect those of the U. Army, the Department of Defense, or the U. Harden my heart to the sights that I must see so soon again, grant me only the power to think clearly, boldly, resolutely, no matter how unnerving the peril.
Let me not fail them. This article originally appeared at Strategy Bridge. Warrior Ethos. By Zachary Mierva July 04, Lieutenant Colonel Germano recognised that such dual standards did not amount to diversity, but rather reinforced gender bias; presumably, however, her chain of command was more interested in demonstrating this hollow version of diversity than really empowering the female trainees.
In this case, it was not diversity that threatened to dilute the Warrior Ethos, but a politically correct approach to inclusion whose focus had drifted from military capability towards other, peripheral priorities.
The Warrior Ethos itself deserves some attention and definition at this point. Very much en vogue at the moment, it is a short piece of US Army doctrine which is a distillation of some very important and fundamental ideas. I will never leave a fallen comrade. Explained and described in FM In this culture, there is no place to hide; every member of the warrior tribe must be fit, tough and good at fighting above all else; leaders must be particularly so.
When reading the US Field Manual, the most obvious example of the Warrior Ethos in action from my own experience was the attitude demonstrated by officers and soldiers from The Parachute Regiment. Their selection process, the recent legends of Arnhem and Goose Green and their national profile had by the s created a culture of fierce personal pride, of belief that they could fight and win and a focus on the business of fighting. Men recruited from the same demographic groups in the same region had much in common and could easily be brought together in their homogeneity.
Does Diversity Dilute the Warrior Ethos?
If they played Rugby, they played League. It is easy to see how those of us who have grown up in this world can see diversity as a threat; without the shared experience before recruitment, how could we be expected to build teams that close? The answer, I would suggest, is obvious to any soldier with experience of leading young recruits through their training to become soldiers.
We build those teams by imbuing our soldiers with the Warrior Ethos; mission first, never give up, never leave a fallen comrade 4. It is these shared values and their embrace that provides the foundation of truly effective fighting teams.
- Does Diversity Dilute the Warrior Ethos?.
- Duke Most Wanted (Heiress Brides, Book 3)!
- PHP jQuery Cookbook.
That these values are not dependent on homogeneity is evident in the example of a Warrior Culture used above. In , 2 Para was one of the few infantry battalions not to be regionally recruited, making them one of the most diverse. This diversity was no drawback at Goose Green, where their warrior culture and fighting spirit as paratroopers kept them moving forwards, rather than a shared experience of life before becoming soldiers. Homogeneity provides an illusion; while we may prefer working with people who share our background and our characteristics, we must be ready and determined to work alongside any member of our military tribe when the need arises, blind to their colour, gender or sexuality.
If we cannot embrace diversity and commit to one another as soldiers and comrades above all else, we have abandoned the Warrior Ethos; if we cannot put the team first, we are not soldiers.
And yet the perceived tension between diversity and the Warrior Ethos remains a widely-held concern. Perhaps the most contentious source of diversity is gender. The physical differences between men and women make it much easier to make excuses about the integration of women and to form arguments that they compromise the Warrior Ethos.
A black man or a gay man will be expected to pass exactly the same fitness tests as a white, straight man, but a woman will be held to a different standard, making it easier for bias to be justified. In the US Marine Corps example cited at the outset, it is clear that for many influential individuals, the training of female marines meant a lowering of standards. Lieutenant Colonel Germano suggests that this lowering of standards and separation in training is intended, either consciously or subconsciously, to prevent female marines from competing as equals with their male counterparts, ensuring that even the very best of them are regarded as second-class marines.
She also highlights an obstacle in the connection between the warriors of today and those of the past.
Our heroes, the paragons of our Warrior Ethos, are all men. This gives room for confusion and for the confirmation of bias. Enlarge cover. Error rating book. Refresh and try again. Open Preview See a Problem? Details if other :. Thanks for telling us about the problem. Return to Book Page. Each of us struggles every day to define and defend our sense of purpose and integrity, to justify our existence on the planet and to understand, if only within our own hearts, who we are and what we believe in.
Spartan Singapore Obstacle Course Races | HURRICANE HEAT: WHY THE WARRIOR ETHOS?
Do we fight by a code? If so, what is it? What is the Warrior Ethos? Where did it come from? What form does it take today? How do we and how can we use it and be true to it in our internal and external lives? The Warrior Ethos is intended not only for men and women in uniform, but artists, entrepreneurs and other warriors in other walks of life.
The book examines the evolution of the warrior code of honor and "mental toughness. Get A Copy. Paperback , pages. More Details Other Editions 4. Friend Reviews. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. To ask other readers questions about The Warrior Ethos , please sign up. Lists with This Book. Community Reviews. Showing Rating details. Sort order. Jul 28, Ian rated it liked it Shelves: military. My review of this book will differ markedly from most. I am not a fan of the Spartans, in fact I find it inconceivable that an ethical individual can find a single redeeming feature in their society.
Sparta was a militarily oriented state bereft of art, science, culture, and, for that matter, commerce. Their society survived only by a reliance on a fascist government that ruthlessly exploited and terrorised a subject population. The most indicative example of the inherent evil of Spartan society My review of this book will differ markedly from most.
Essentially, the Spartan ruling class declared war on their own people. This declaration gave the Spartan government, the military, and the secret police, a pseudo-legal justification to torture and murder malcontents, an act that was carried out on a regular basis something like when the president says you can do it, it is legal.
This was a victory gained under the leadership of democratic Athens, and the democratically elected Athenian statesman, Themistocles. It was the Athenians who withstood two Persian invasions, who saw the destruction and occupation of their homeland, and endured the forced evacuation of their city.
In comparison the Spartans were terrified of the prospect of the Persians even approaching the Peloponnese—their rigid, hierarchical society was ready to collapse if confronted. Sparta was also tardy to give the best interpretation , in resisting the Persians, and showed every inclination of coming to an arrangement with the Persian King. A half century later, the Spartans dealt away the hard won independence of the Greek city states of Asia in return for Persian assistance in their war against Athens.
Then, following their victory over Athens, the Spartans established a short lived hegemony in Greece. One noted for its oppression, murder, sheer lack of imagination, and corruption—corruption by the noble Spartans. The history of ancient Sparta consisted of several centuries of brutal warfare, largely for self-aggrandisement, and then a collapse into an amusement park for Roman tourists.
Sparta contributed nothing to human civilisation or social progress.
You are here:
To answer a question Pressfield poses, Leonidas most likely had waterboared and other things innumerable uppity helots, and if questioned about the practice, would express amazement at being so questioned—and then maybe question the questioner. This dream about Spartan "honour" is in reality a nightmare. With all its many imperfections look to Athens, the birthplace of western civilisation, for an example of what was best in the ancient world. I suggest reading the Funeral Oration of the Athenian statesman Pericles for an illuminating self-portrait of Athens.
You can also of course read the Spartan thoughts on these subjects—no wait, you cannot—the Spartans did not write anything. So, the Spartans were great because they "exposed" some would call it murder , new born infants who had minor, unimportant birth defects, they despised those who had physical disabilities Stephen Hawking, for example , they beat children who could not steal food well enough, and had families ripped apart as children were compelled to live in military dormitories.
There is no evidence of this, but what about the rape of children in ancient Sparta? How many Spartan boys, who, when they were seven years old and torn away from their families for the good of the Spartan state, were sexually molested? And then, due to this "honour", never complained or protested.
How much brutal bullying and violence took place? There is nothing here but authoritarianism. The ideal "virtue" of every fascist state.